
Science fiction is, by all accounts, a relatively infantile genre of writing. From the earliest true masters, such as Jules Verne, we were given glimpses in to the depth and span that this genre can attain. One of the truly gifted authors of the science fiction genre was Arthur C. Clarke. He was able to combine incredible depth and foresight in to his stories, while also preserving the sheer humanity of our next adventure.
I only recently began expanding my reading in to Clarke’s impressive resume of science fiction tales, and so far only have one review up, Rendevouz with Rama. I can admit that something about Clarke’s work seemed larger than I was comfortable with - like he was a stoic author that merely appealed to the classic masses of science fiction culture. Truth be told, the Rama novels (I’ve read them all since that initial review) are stupdendous. Furthermore, I just recently re-watched 2001: A Space Odessey by Arthur C. Clarke and Stanley Kubrick. Again, 2001 is a masterful piece of science fiction that blends the alien and the unknown with the human-scale, and with an artistry that has been mimicked since but never captured.
The New York Times just published an interesting article further analyzing what Clarke meant to the science fiction and literary world, titled, For Clarke, Issues of Faith, but Tackled Scientifically. I think it’s an interesting read - and it does point out something inherent within the thread of many great science fiction storytellers - there is something significant about the universe. In Rama, it was the answer of the question of our lonliness and isolation in the universe. In 2001, it was a question of our origins. It reminds me greatly of Orson Scott Card’s stories that touch at the notion of god and humanity, but without the pleading and placating that is so common in non-science-fiction material. Perhaps there are answers, but perhaps it’s the journey for those answers that is worth far more than the result itself.
I will make sure to revisit the Clarke section of the bookstore and pick up a few more titles that pique my interest and share my thoughts with you. If you would like to learn more about Clarke’s life, the NY Times has a very lengthy and comprehensive obituary on the man. In the meantime, let me just end by saying, Mr. Clarke, you will be missed, and thank you for all you’ve given us.

Well, Arthur C. Clarke’s Rendezvous with Rama is the book equivalent to me. After years of wandering past the Clarke section in the bookstore, I finally decided to see for myself what the big deal was, and picked up the first installment for this series. I have to admit, I was really amazed that I hadn’t caught on to Clarke earlier, and after reading the first few chapters I was absolutely hooked. Fortunately, my coworkers at the water cooler don’t have to hear about this because I’ve got this handy blog here.
Entries (RSS)